Enough is enough

I’m the sort of person who, by nature does not rush into anything. I waited for two weeks to flatten the curve, I socially distanced and wore a mask, I washed my hands and mostly stayed home.

I did not get sick. Nobody I knew got sick, though I did hear of a few people who got sick and recovered.

Since I don’t like to rush into anything, I was happy to wait and see when it came to the jab.

I’m glad I did.

Nearly two years later and some of my friends have had their third shot. Have you ever heard of a va**ine that is so ineffective you need to have three shots in a year?

And then the political push for mandatory va**ination started to ramp up, with people I know losing their jobs because they refuse to take an experimental treatment. It was at this point that I became very suspicious.

And now this:


Recently a Freedom of Information request was made by a government accountability group called Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency.

According to their website, this group of public health professionals, medical professionals, scientists, and journalists exists for the sole purpose of analyzing the data the FDA used to issue an emergency use authorization (EUA) of the Pfizer COVID-19 jabs.

The group asked the U.S. federal government to release 329,000 pages of documents.

After the courts ordered the FDA to release the information, the federal agency made an attempt to delay the release. Justice Department lawyers representing the FDA asked a federal judge to let them process 500 pages per month.

Grudgingly, the FDA released the first batch of documents.

Upon review of the first documents, it is clear why the FDA is desperate to delay the processing of these documents as long as possible.

The documents represent recorded data from December 1, 2020 through February 28, 2021.

There were a total of 42,086 case reports containing 158,893 events, including 1,223 deaths.

Under any other circumstance, such a vaccine would have been removed from the market right away, certainly not fully endorsed, marketed, funded, and mandated by government. It was so bad that Pfizer reveals, “Due to the large numbers of spontaneous adverse event reports received for the product, the MAH has prioritized the processing of serious cases” and also had to hire more full-time employees to handle the reporting. How was it ethical for the FDA to withhold this information from the public, and how can it ever be ethical to mandate such a shot, even if one believes that, in general, a government could wield such authority? This is especially true now that we know its efficacy is minimal at best and downright enhances the virus at worst.


It is becoming painfully clear that the serious adverse effects of these mRNA va**ines have been known from the start, yet deemed acceptable under the trope ‘the benefits outweigh the risks’.

For any medical procedure of an experimental nature there needs to be informed consent. Governments cannot and should not mandate or coerce anyone to risk serious injury or death without at the very least giving all the information as to any likely negative outcomes.

For those of you reading this who have already had the jab I ask this question. If you had known that there was the possibility of serious side effects such as myocarditis, or pericarditis or death, would you have still gone ahead with it? If so, fine, at least you are making an informed decision. But what about the people who thought, hmmm, for a disease that has a 99.95% recovery rate do I want to risk the serious side effects, and then found themselves on the wrong side of a demonization campaign? Why are the non-va**inated suddenly the problem?

Is that right?

Fun fact: the most highly va**inated countries, like Israel and Malta are presently seeing higher c0v1d cases than ever. How do you blame the unva**inated for that?

It is also clear that effective non-va**ine treatments for c0v1d were being used with great success and yet the doctors that tried to make these treatments public were fired, or subject to intense disinformation campaigns.

I may have been va**ine hesitant when this whole thing started, but now my mind is clear — the va**ines do not function like normal va**ines, and they are dangerous, so I am choosing never to have the jab.

I also wish to state on record that any person who promotes mandatory va**ination with these experimental gene therapies is guilty of criminal conduct.

If the powers that be hadn’t stepped over the freedom of choice line I wouldn’t be writing this, but they did, so I am. In all conscience I can not stay silent.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s